| by admin | No comments

What are the dental health risks of fluoridation?

By Elizabeth O’Connor The Globe and Mail’s Elizabeth Ochs and Mike Farrar, CBC’s Andrew Davies and The Associated Press have all been reporting on a growing movement to reverse the fluoridation of Canadian public dental health.

Now, a new study shows the results are not as rosy as those in the past.

As the country’s water fluoridation program takes off, a growing number of people are questioning whether the government’s decision to inject millions of litres of water into the water supply is being safe.

Dr. Richard Gervais, an associate professor at the University of British Columbia’s School of Public Health and a co-author of the new study, said the research also found a link between the fluoride exposure and some dental health problems.

“I was surprised to find that we see more of the same effects in terms of adverse effects on the dental system than in terms with adverse effects in the general population,” Gervas said.

“The effects are more significant for those who are older and who are more likely to have chronic diseases that are more common in younger people, like diabetes, which is a disease that is particularly associated with dental caries and is associated with reduced tooth enamel and reduced tooth structure.”

He said it’s important to understand that the findings of the study don’t mean that fluoridation has been safe.

It’s important that people continue to be educated about what’s involved in drinking fluoridated water, and how much fluoride they are actually drinking, he said.

The new study was based on data from 1,743 adults in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver.

The findings were published online by the Canadian Dental Association in the journal The Lancet Oncology on Friday.

The study involved a comparison of fluoride exposure among people in three age groups.

Those who were younger at the start of the program and older at the end of it were found to be more likely than those who were older and older in each age group to experience some dental carious diseases, such as tooth decay and dental carie.

The study also found that older people had higher rates of caries than younger people and people with a family history of dental carness.

In addition, there was a correlation between the level of fluoride in the water and the prevalence of carious disease, including dental carying.

People who drank fluoridated tap water had higher levels of caried tooth enamels, tooth enodermosis and cavities, the study found.

In contrast, people who drank tap water with less fluoride had lower levels of these types of dental health symptoms.

The researchers said the results suggest that the level and types of fluoride that are in tap water are the most important determinant of the prevalence and severity of dental symptoms in people.

The level of fluoridated drinking water in the U.S. was about 1.8 parts per billion, compared with the U,S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended level of about 1 part per billion.

The EPA said that’s a safe level of water to drink for most people.

Drinking fluoridated municipal water was found to have the lowest level of dental effects, the researchers found.

A similar study published in The Lancet found a higher risk of cavities and tooth decay in people who had high levels of fluoride.

The results were similar in the Canadian study, with people who were exposed to fluoridated urban tap water having higher levels and higher rates than people who lived in rural water.

In general, there were fewer cases of dental decay among the children in the two studies.

However, the results were not entirely consistent, with more children with lower levels and fewer cases being more likely.

Researchers said the study provides additional data that will help health authorities and health professionals to make informed decisions about whether to continue to fluoridate municipal water, as the government plans to do this year.

Dr Gervases co-authors on the study were Dr. James Sperling of McMaster University, Dr. David Wainwright of the University in Calgary, and Dr. Rolf Munk of the Institute of Public Affairs at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ont.

In an interview with CBC News, Sperlings said the data are “very preliminary.”

“This is a very early, preliminary study and we’re trying to learn more,” he said, noting that the researchers were not able to measure fluoride levels directly.

“We’re looking at the exposure, the time and the exposure over time.

So that’s very preliminary and we don’t know if it’s the amount of fluoride, the timing, or the amount that’s the causative factor,” he added.”

It could be something else.

We have to wait for more data.””

It’s a new thing, and there are still a lot of uncertainties, but this is a promising step in understanding how this is occurring.”

The government announced in June it would replace some of the water treatment